speed is not power.
by showing you're talking out your backside? sure.
0/3. you're improving.
he doesn't think so, nor has he ever claimed such, which is why he made a point of trying to select an ideal opponent. all round, another $hit,...
utter rubbish, pac won at least 2 rounds clearly with flush shots that rocked floyd. you don't remember me saying a damn thing about collazo....
what was dubious about brook's win over porter? what feasible opponent will offer khan more money than brook?
does this qualify as post-modernist self-referential irony?
i can guarantee i'm thinking that now.
joshua v whyte should be fun. hope to see galahad back in the mix soon, too. my guess is he beats quigg but comes up just short v frampton.
bit of a stupidly obvious statement. by definition, for pac to have won he would have needed more success, which could only have happened in a...
given the capacity of many on here to take offence at any imagined slight by carl, probably something along the lines of "legend. i'm a huge fan"!
i think you're 1/2 right, but thurman may prove me wrong.
whatever one's opinion of the man and his style, his abilities are undeniable. credit where it's due.
lost every round? thread fails.
we'll see in time if there was an injury, ellerbe seemed convinced. there was no fear of needles, which is why pac never claimed there was.
