too small, no defenses, and outpointed a dilapidated Hagler the way Leon Spinks beat a dilapidated Ali Just remember the redrooster rule:...
i remember an article on Ali after the Frazier fight if he thought Ali was an all time great heavyweight and his words were "emphatically no!"
the ones I feel confident of are Holmes, Dokes, Coetzee , Stribling, Baer
good insight from one who knows but gives himself too much credit "I had him" is nonsense. it was one way traffic
I would take Holyfield and throw him out of the top ten Johnson, Jeffries, Dempsey, Bowe, Louis round out the top five. after that who cares
Benitez had speed?
I thought Leonard showed lots of heart vs an ancient Camacho, especially in the fifth :lol: in the fight before that vs Norris, I was...
as a body puncher, I would agree but this potential (to beat any welter/middle) you're talking about is an empty claim you don't have the burden...
Hector Camacho
who you cheered for makes no difference. Ray ain't beating Monzon. He was too chicken to make a defense (but he wasn't too chicken to pick a fight...
you're right, there is no defense against speed. You can ask Leonard and he'll tell you that's the exact same reason why he lost to Norris
Seriously, how long do people think Carlos would hold Tony off with just a jab? my feeling John, is that hadn't yet seen the best of the bull...
I also am not sold on Leonard as a middleweight for two reasons First, his anxiousness to take on the same man he fearfully ducked for years,...
hagler didnt take the Duran fight to show his mettle, he took it soley for the money and exposure that's what the Hearns fight was for,...
in this case it's all relevant because Ray was heavily favored over Terry because of his experience but it was Terry's speed that saved the day...
