Yeah 1990. My point was that he said that before he fought tommy
Foreman and shavers are not in the list, read the first post
You are not educating to anybody .You are alone like a sad guy on this thread because everybody agreed the there are people with bigger/heavier...
Yes ... A bigger frame is a heavier frame... Pure logic... What is the part that you don't understand?
It was before he fought morrison, it was in 1991 or so
Ok english is not my idiom
The difference is that some punchers like tyson or louis were better combo punchers , very effective with combinations but guys like...
Who is talking about louis dempsey or baer? Changing the topic? Nice try... Tyson and foreman were fully developed at 18
Quarry could lose by cuts but he would give to the slow rocky a boxing lesson , he took shots from harder punchers than marciano
There are 1000 ways to increment musculature not only lifting weights and tyson trained his musculature like an animal if he did not it he could...
What the hell are you talking about? Some people on this forum are experts inventing words.. What i said is: Tyson did increment his mass because...
And who said that rocky should fight at 210?
complete bullshi7 Tyson did his pro debut at 18.... And he was fully developed...
Your boys frazier and liston are a nightmare for holmes
No, he would not
