No he didn't. All 3 judges giving the 12th to Fury, where Usyk outlanded him 2:1 and landed bigger shots, shows how they tried to make this fight...
I haven't seen that much of a one sided poll in a while.
He faced similar talent. Are you overrating the 90's again?
Rankings are not based on hypotethicals. He might have beaten him, but ducked him, so it's irrelevant. AJ was universally ranked number 1 across...
Dubois doesn't block punches, that's one of the reasons he gets hit so much. He relies on his legs to move out of range. A master of precision...
Something inbetween option 1 and 2.
I think Usyk beats 90's Tyson (70/30), Bowe (60/40) and Lewis (55/45) and has 50/50 with Holyfield.
I think the fight for the gold medal could have gone either way, but he definitely lost the first one.
I don't care if he said anything about AJ's power. I watched the 9th and saw him hurt and backpeddaling while AJ was dominating. Fury dominated 2...
He got outclassed by a much better fighter. These are facts, lol.
Both Fury and AJ won 4-5 rounds in these fights. And yes, Fury hurt him with the uppercut, but Usyk wasn't as hurt as he was in the 9th round...
He had a party before the AJ fight too, lol. Your conspiracy theory just went to shyte.
AJ hurt Usyk in the 9th much more than Fury did. He got him backpaddeling even more. Plus Fury got sent to the q*eer street by the middleweight...
I still think that was the best performance against Usyk in the HW division.
50/50 fight, but I would take Pulev. More proven.
