no, Ruiz isn't a better win for Roy than Lacy is for Calzaghe. don't go changing history to suit, you hear me now. it makes you look stupid and...
yeah, but Tarver got ripped off in the first fight. it's alright though, because Tarver knocked Jones TFO with one shot in the rematch. then...
Calzaghe had been having lots of injuries round about this time so wasn't exactly putting on the performances that made people take notice. they...
yeah. great fight that lived up to the billing. i picked Murray to win, but Crolla surprised me and came through like a champ.
Hopkins took the fight. there were close rounds to start with, but Bernard started to warm up and Shu never brought anything other than the crap...
i have high hopes for this Kid. but there's no need to rush him. let him settle for a while longer, then the higher class of opponents will come....
of course the points i was making have been lost on you. you've been doing it for the whole Thread. Foreman and Frazier are disgustingly...
you made a fool of yourself so you show this??? yeah, you're the smart one here. :-(
it was in that fight, yes.
so a robbery that happened 200 years ago means that corruption has been going on that long in the UK?? go and have a lie down. you're clearly not...
:lol: Hagler got the win you fool. and what part of "we're not always spotless when it comes to giving the right decisions to the right...
then Joe got the numbers wrong. it was reported that under 3000 tickets were sold to Brits. not all of them were Welsh.
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl yeah, sure he's better. Frazier is clearly one of the most overrated fighters in boxing's long history. so is Foreman,...
it says they were good enough on the night. well, Taylor was in one fight at least. Hopkins was too old by the time Dawson got to him. lesser...
just gave the link a read. you base the corruption in the UK on ONE, yes ONE, fight???? that could quite easily be the most pathetic reply...
