:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl :patsch and again. go and read the post of yours i quoted. you said... "i asked Assassin 3 questions" i'm...
but i didn't say those things about Joe did i??? you read my post completely wrong. looks like you read my reply wrong as well. as i say,...
you didn't ask me any questions actually. you made incorrect statements. like always. :good
i'm not going to point out yet again why you're wrong. you'll only come back with a load of nonsense anyway. you're an Ego driven cretin who...
i'm supposedly not writing a fair post but, you agree with me on the circumstances surrounding Eubank? i don't know why i bother. also, YOU saying...
you don't like Khan much do you. forget about the power, the weight difference alone would be far too much.
you lost the argument when you claimed Eubank didn't pad his record. that's exactly what he did most of the time. and by choice as well. unlike...
oh, really???? you'd be dangerous if you had a brain wouldn't you? you said... "he's telling you that Americans noticed Eubank and Froch...
everything connected to the RING is of no worth. who cares what they have to say.
we don't know what version we're getting from Khan just yet. if it's the same V. Hunter style but worse than it was against Diaz, then Khan isn't...
you write pretty well when high on glue. i can just about slobber in a corner whilst making shrieking noises when i'm glued up.
hell no! did you not see Manny just cover up every time Tim came forward?? if this was the Hatton version of Pac, he would have taken those...
this doesn't take away from Pac's win. in fact, it enhances it because Bradley is in his prime but a ropey looking Pac can still beat him clearly....
yep, i agree. it was clear to see from the first bell.
why is this site filled with crazy conspiracy theorists?? Bradley did not throw the fight. he just lost to the better fighter.
