Calzaghe is a pure boxer because he relies on nothing other than his boxing skills to fight. Thats as simple as i can put it. He is not a great...
He didint say great, he said pure, meaning thats all they do. And being sloppy means nothing, boxing is what he does, nothing else.
Someone defending Calzaghe is in no position to criticize anyone elses resume.
Malinaggi and Calzaghe are the best comtemporary examples i can think of.
You've left out Lennox Lewis. This thread is fail.
I'd give him a chance against Cotto, and would like to see that fight.
Of All Time. As in greatest of all time.
Did you say Pacquiao has more power than Mosley?:huh
Hatto beating Pacquiao wouldnt be that surprising considering he is the bigger man, i feel he will lose, but he has more of a chance than most...
Taylor is more skillful. I dont need to explain it becuase your post makes no attempt at explaining why you think Froch is more skillful, when its...
The Hopkins fight proved nothing when it comes to his stopping power at 168. Hopkins' defense nullified Pavlik's power. Fact is Pavilk hits much...
Froch is older than him.
Well said.
It wasnt all qualiy if you're a brit, watching your fighter be hopelessly outclassed, but for everyone else it was a pretty good fight from start...
I agree, i thought taylor was going to win as well and he did out box him. And no ones saying change your answer. But Froch KO'd Taylor, is he a...
