If you actually followed boxing rather than being a Klitschko fanboy you'd know that the winner of Fury v Klitschko was order to face Glazkov in...
Yeah. Just imagine if Fury hadn't beaten Klitschko. We wouldn't have gotten any of those things and instead we would've witness the thrilling...
Well he has robbed us of straight fire classic Klitschko v Glazkov and we'd probably be highly anticipating Klitschko-Chagev II as we speak. Shame...
Damn Tyson Fury for beating Wladimir Klitschko last year. Damn him to hell! If Klitschko would've won, the next fight in line would have be...
Yeah. He tried to sue Dan Goosen for putting him for trying to put him in the ring for all to see it.
Well its a step above Ward winning the Super 6 who fights once every two years in boring fights and his only way of staying relevant was to piggy...
Depends what it's for. If it's PEDS then yeah, I think so. Recreational drugs, maybe not. Also I'm not sure the losing your licence part is that...
Nothing on Tyson Fury vacating his RING title either. And as per Ring rules, he's still the champion.
-Lemieux was a proper unification and agreed on by the two sides what the split was be. -Wade was the IBF mandatory, standard is 25%, however...
He could, but he probably sees Prescott as too live for him. Ergo fighting this Vargas fellow in a none title fight instead.
If Fury gets stripped of a lineal title for vacating sanctioning body belts, Canelo needs to be too. Mick Hennesey does say in the statement...
Well if you actually do think about it and Fury hadn't beaten Klitschko, we would've seen maybe Klitschko v Glazkov being that he was next in line...
Khan's out with injury at the moment, so maybe he should give Herrera a rematch and avenge that loss?
A source from the WBA when quizzed about why GGG-Brook wasn't sanctioned as a title fight also made the valid point that those two don't have...
I think he'd have a shout but Kell Brook has a tendency to one up him. If Amir Khan beats Connor McGregor in the UFC, I fully expect to see...
