if there's a KO i'll be very surprised if there's an early one either way.
aye. i love watching that tito-hopkins fight simply becasuse it's a terrific performance by hopkins.
an unoriginal one though. if he s not interested in putting himself on the line with an opinion i won't waste my time with him
very good post. i just want to add that saying hatton dominated his division for years was 'watered down' by his association with frank warren...
i'm australian and there's no way in hell tszyu is the best LW of all time. but this is a good poll. tszyu's resume really isn't as good as it...
i pretty much agree with this. pac's 'in and out' tactics and his non-conventional style are as important as his speed. hatton isn't a great...
if hatton wins that's the logical answer. not to take away from hatton's victory if it happens, but that's just common sense.
thats right. brian nielsen was a classic euro fighter who never took on the US. decent fighter but thats all.
caling tito's chin '****' is ignorant. tito had a history of going down early in fights - but as far as i can remember he got up and knocked...
lets see what williams achieves before we make a comparison like this. tito was a very good fighter but his weakness was usually against more...
last post for me tonight....
your post might have had some weight until you belittled it with this last sentence....
fair enough. but use your own words to answer him. i'm just saying that if you have to borrow cliches it cheapens your argument.
"that is a nice period at the end of your sentence..oh wait ..did you forget to put a period at the end of your sentence..FAIL!". thats a quick...
see what i mean? stop being so petty.
