its common sense for oscar and a gift for chavez jr.
you've editted, ok. well i donø't know where you're from but i'm betting its the UK. if you've read what i've been posting i havent been...
that doesnt make sense. what did you mean to say?
but you do like to start threads, pose questions, but not put yourself on the line.. i'm just saying if you guys disagree back yourself and have...
vargas for me. i love that fight and the edge that came with it.
but it illustrattes beautifully what i've been trying to explain tonight
roy was never moving "up and down through weight classes" - but i agree he could have done more about it. the eyesore with calzaghe is that he...
fighters at this level don't "lose their bottle". at the highest levels of boxing fighters punch themselves out - it's often a gamble when you...
you said it was a 50/50 fight and used taylor's "mundane rythm" as a foil for froch. you knew what my point was.
spinks is skilled but his eye-candy is horrific. i'd love to see his career over again under different influences but its unlikely to change...
i've only seen this post from you but you've shown beautifully why you show a half naked woman in your avatar and post disrespectfully to people....
because you're comparing a paper champion to someone who's proven himself already on the world stage.
hopkins biggest 'public' wins were tito and oscar. without them he ruled a poor divison just like jones did - but both were super-gifted fighters....
no disrespect but this is a typical illusion. why do you prefer froch over taylor? compare achievements.
reference?
