thats my guess too.
quote of the century.
you idiot
to be honest it doesn't say that much about froch because this is a gift for him - for exactly the same reasons which you used to say why taylor...
klitschko being a heavyweight makes a big difference in that argument. people who don't play golf know tiger woods and people who don't like...
...and everyone knows that you do like williams....so why don't you guys go head to head?
why do you think taylor winning is better for the sport?
i agree. but saying he had a "bad night" - and having one again - can change a fighter's career pretty fast. i'm really hoping someone like...
it's very naaive to think williams is unbeatable but it's pretty common immediately after a fight for people to go overboard. after saying...
i'll be surprised if froch beats taylor and i'll be happy to eat humble pie if froch wins. go to youtube if you want to check out fighters you...
how do you define a better depth of competition though? and don'øt you think people would show more respect for calzaghe if he took his shot...
thats right. but look how quickly ricky hatton changed his career once he left warren. was it 3 fights and then he got floyd? and all he did...
good post. but don't forget boxing is a minority sport in the bigger picture. with arum and oscar willing to negotiate fights now that makes a...
because calzaghe is the only legitimate champion i can think of who never took this chance. prime is ambiguous, i agree, but pavlik was the man...
hopkins is a great fighter for a reason. i didn't say he was dead in the water and hopkins beating pavlik adds to hopkins' legacy because it's...
