I was not countering your statement. Simply emphasising it's irrelevance. I can do what I want. Particularly when it is correct to do so
You're much more scraping barrels, than spewing facts Most people don't gamble. I refute the second statement. Which is the only relevant one.
This is genuinely like the post of a desperate man, scrambling to convince himself of his sanity
You should watch a fight, then form your opinion. Not the other way around
Never felt laughter regarding Rigo, just anger and disappointment at him showing no heart at all
Warrington by decision, I'm backing him to clean this division up now, all the belts
I do agree with the sentiment, but there could be good amateurs on here with plans of turning pro, couldn't knock them for believing in...
That guy makes the best boxing videos and promos, real talent, should be picked up by a network
An update for me would be: 1. Anthony Joshua 2. Callum Smith 3. Tyson Fury 4. Josh Warrington 5. Josh Taylor 6. Billy Joe Saunders 7. Dillian...
The real worst thing about Joshua v Wilder is that I actually think it has passed its peak hype. I'm not saying it has done so even nearly as...
I sure did underrate him. Can't call it a fluke two times in a row, hopefully no more of this "Selby was drained" or "Frampton was finished" talk...
If he can do that to Carl Frampton even when he is/was supposedly "finished", then he can do it to anyone. Don't get me wrong, Santa Cruz would...
Agree with everything except that he'd have beaten Josh a couple fights ago. I thought Frampton would win the fight, quite confidently actually....
No, Usyk is quite far ahead of anybody, but Warrington is now deservedly in the conversation
Frampton v Santa Cruz III AJ v Fury Lomachenko v M.Garcia
