Thx, its just the same few people, they cant take level criticism even though I applaud their heroes feats too.
eubankhad a right to compare benn and joe,but couldnt really compare them to jones firsthand.
joe for sure, but with no pop or relatively little accuracy. You can peekaboo through and walk towards him without feeling so bad. Benns punches...
course there were. i am just telling you facts, which were recognised which werent. As long as you arent disputing them its fine.
ease up, those are some lame guys you mentioned. Why so? Cant just go around knocking the world champion with doofuses who stand no chance of...
yes today, but it wasnt before 2004.
umno i said recognised at the time. joes wbo ones only became recognised when the wbo were only recognised when made after and including lacy. so...
did well on his ability, the way he tried to smash shot roy jones back into consciousness when shot jones was flat out has bizarrely become his...
good world power in his prime but not elite. When retired it had a faded a little. It was most useful against guys without the depth of skill...
thats not the complete truth, ward made more unified defences as did froch. kesssler did too. as did sven otkke by a large margin, though again...
thats not the complete truth, ward made more unified defences as did froch. as did sven otkke by a large margin, though again with a lot more...
I am happy to score it either way, either a draw, or a marginal win for 43 year old hopkins or for calzaghe, which shows I am not being biased....
it is arguably though, isnt it, Kessler is the other option, theres no other good opponent in his career to compare to kessler and 43 year old...
hopkins made unified and non-unified defences., as did tyson. joe also made non unified defences and unified defences...i mean one unified...
tihng is even if you call it a draw, then its still joes best in in his wholecareer, this draw with a 43 year old man you shuld respects joes...
