recognised title defences, or including when unrecognised? do you mean unified title defences or non unified unrecognised?
explains a lot, but why is your brain made of cheese?
it was better than yours true, but weak in the grand scheme of things.
of course not, Tyson was not at his best,, however much you may think he was, we have to go with fact.
it is real. for homeless people etc.
yes, he was able to beat good contender level LHW opponents, if you look at my posts I have already said he was a level above that, able to beat...
its makes me sad that people try to take away arguably joes best-of-his-entire-career win against this 43 year old man. be nicer, guys.
yes for the first six rounds, and would have stopped joe in 2 if joe hadnt lowblowed. BUT you have to go with the full fight, my friend. Joe...
deal with which round he "smashed" him? let us know. oh you wont. ok...
Joe did well to move up and just about beat a 43 year old, although arguably a loss too so perhaps not. Scrappy fight, with Joe lowblowing...
its heart really, or anti-heart. As soon as he knows hes earned his paycheque , Fraduley jumps on the floor . The guy was a joke.
another day, another "sparring" tale.
of coruse they wouldnt want smoke from jones toney mccallum johnson and nunn, who would? Even one of our top british SMWs gibberin joe calzaghe...
Benn beat his americans and those worldwide, not a vast stretch but he did it, with a recognised title so theres no question for him. Eubank...
nunn easy
