are you suggesting he only stepped up when it didnt matter if he lost??
what are you talking about? who said he was recorded as won? and once u have got it, come back and reply to my post.
thanks for admitting your hate.
i gave u 25 long time ago, i wonder how long you will keep this charade up.
u r back true hating on me clearly when i said 3g will raise himself above canelo soon.
Smiff smash. Hard northerner.
wrong that is like that. u dont like being WRONG?
wrong.
cheers, garcon,one day u may run the cafe.
c'mon bika wasn't that bad, he is joes 3rd best defence. If hes half bad then thats not a good indictment of joes career. noone expected joe to...
true, but at 36 years of age, joe needed an excsue to get out of making more than one standard level SMW defence as opposed to soft wbo ones....
bika was not horrible, my friend he was a worthy opponent at SMW, but he was just a smw novice at the time with no smw fights. he is joes 2nd...
you have to pick the better guy, which is currently canelo, the proven elite. but 3G is about to raise hmself above that level when he smashes...
in fact, in my post - charlo was my substitute canelo, not for sturm. sturm was my substitute 3G. you just misread it and blew your top on...
he wont beat Kov even if he did get in the ring with him. It'd be like Thorin Oakenshield vs Gandalf. Well a younger years version of it.
