That's dicrediting him way too much. He was a better boxer than Ruddock. He was an international amateur for 5 years before turning professional,...
That's a fair comment. But a few years from now Whyte will be getting sparked out by every Tom, Dick and Harry too.
You not just asking. You are just being a moron.
Yep. Twice to crap ones, when he was rated at the top of the division too. it disqualifies him from consideration in the historical elite, as far...
Whyte's literally on a winning streak of one fight, against a man well ripe for retirement. It's baffling how highly regarded he's become by some.
Yeah. But I suspect Whyte would never take that fight. He'd rather hide behind the dodgy result of the first match.
Kabayel is at least Euro level. He's better than Chisora. He is more skilled than Whyte. But he's shite. Just like Whyte.
Whyte would be another shite name too. Whyte is a bum too. People seem to be forgetting that.
Also known as "AJ's best wins"
As late as Vitali Klitschko it was obvious he had big holes in his game. Or Rahman. Or Mercer. 1996. He was excellent against Mason in his 15th...
You don't. "He beats every man he ever faced"
Whyte has a controversial "win" over Parker (it should have been a draw), and a close one against Rivas. That's it. Rivas himself has very thin...
Miller got away with it for ages. Holyfield went from 190 to about 212 in his prime, lots of fighters are doing similar these days. You can't...
The Mike Tyson Story back in those days reads like the classic archetypal story of the rise and fall of a boxing champion. Just like those old...
I am not saying he didn't improve under Steward. I am saying he looked very good against Mason and Ruddock, much much better than expected, he did...
