Wlad's gonna outclass Joshua! Watch.
I'm picking Wlad to KO Joshua, got money on it too. Joshua's a nice guy but he hasn't fought anybody at all, nothing he has done makes him any...
Therefore he was tested, and he passed the test. Even if you think he lost, he lost to a much better fighter at a later point in his career than...
It is pure greed, like most things nowadays it's all about show and to hell with the substance.
Fair dos. Just winds me up, it's everywhere you look!
This is why that fight is so intriguing, is it a case of Wlad not knowing when to quit or Joshua's hype train being derailed? I'm leaning toward...
This is my point, losses are normal, but why are they considered unacceptable by so many nowadays when multiple losses to mediocre opposition in...
Surely if you think GGG lost to Jacobs he must have been at least tested somewhere near to the fullest?
OK his first loss coming three years into his career against a guy who has lost five fights with two draws? By today's standards LaMotta would be...
Also, there is zero chance of anyone being considered special even if they retire undefeated like Floyd. Nowadays there is nothing anyone can do...
Or maybe the pioneers of boxing back in the day just stood out against primitive opponents. They're bound to look incredible when displaying...
The point that old greats are beyond scrutiny, despite losing to numerous 'bums'.
Would you take the 19 losses of SRR seriously?
And who would you say is special? I expect their record to be without the tiniest of blemish.
That could explain it, it's still annoying though. I remember watching Floyd/Hatton in a social club, full of Hatton 'fans' screaming their head...
