:cheeseburger:Everyone will pick Robinson which will just cement my point.
Almost everyone loses to guys levels below them, it's the modern day obsession with invincibility that confuses me. It's OK to lose, I have days...
Funnily enough despite never being defeated Floyd is a prime example. He never got the credit he deserved either. God forbid Castillo got that...
In that case surely you'd also predict Robinson would've evaporated LaMotta who had lost to (by today's standards) 'nobodies'. Yet he lost...
My point is, traditionally you could be a great fighter and lose, yet today it is not acceptable to even have a close fight. You are a fraud, a...
I agree SRR and JLM were both great fighters, but the double standards are obscene. Both those guys can lose multiple times to what would be...
I agree it was a total let down. I think Fury fought that way as it was his main key to victory but Wlad looked completely confused and gun shy.
It's hard to say with the amount of delusion going on. Maybe fighters of the past have been insanely overhyped? SRR lost to lesser fighters than...
He won 40 fights then lost to LaMotta who in turn lost to what would be considered 'bums' by today's standards.
But why are they considered hype machines? Robinson for example, lost to LaMotta who had lost to various 'bums' yet he is beyond criticism? If...
Boxing has the weirdest fans nowadays, the likes of Sugar Ray Robinson can lose 19 fights and no one will hear a bad word against him yet for...
Don't get me wrong Jacobs did great and there wasn't much in it but I think the fight fell victim to the syndrome where the supposedly invincible...
Nah I am just stating what I observed. Maybe you define 'hurt' differently to me, but to me it means wobbled, hitting the canvas or in some way...
Can't be that obvious because I did.
I just rewatched the GGG/Jacobs fight in HD and GGG won, it was close but no robbery. He was the aggressor throughout, never looked hurt, knocked...
