i don't need to construct a convincing argument to counter such a ludicrous comment. You only need to watch his fights to know his athleticism...
Pity they never fought everyone in history then, isn't it?
No, he isn't. True. Harder punchers as well.
The ability to acquire skills and utilise them is an athletic trait which Wilder doesn't possess. So no, he's nowhere near the most athletic boxer...
I picked Fury but only on the proviso that he's able to get back to his best after his time away from the ring. Of the current crop of guys I'd...
Yeah I wouldn't Joe to find out really. Joshua hits hard enough to rock and stop him so a slight increase in punch resistance (and Joe's been...
There aren't too many harder shots than the uppercut Joshua landed in the eleventh. That was immense.
He wouldn't get any flack from me. I expect him to do stuff like this. Besides, it'd be a good fight, and a winnable one for Bellew.
If I was Bellew I'd go for Wilder. Parker would absolutely murder him and I think he knows this. Wilder, for all his power, is very beatable.
A swift call to Mauricio would settle all that.
Wilder would be an easy way to nab a belt providing the WBC actually endorses that fight, but it wouldn't really give Joe too much useful...
Well he's unproven at the very top level. Joshua leapfrogged him with the Klitschko win there. He'll need to get in there with someone like...
I'd say Parker's advantages over Joshua are speed, both footspeed and handspeed. He might have a slight advantage in punch resistance as well,...
The uppercut is up there. Not sure I'd say the same about the right hand. Both are a damn sight harder than anything Earnie Shavers landed, however.
Parker's got more than enough power to hurt and stun AJ, probably put him to the canvas as well. That's not the issue I see with him. His main...
