bull****, sorry... I'm not changing anything. For me, everything matters: the value of the rivals, the eye test, the quality of the victory, the...
why should I be careful if I think so? all Tyson's rivals from the Berbick to Ruddock fight seem better than Zanon, Evangelista, Le Doux. And...
perfectly said
Damn, brave guy. Holmes is one of the few who for me can be equal or higher than MT (not for me, but it's ok), but he didn't have such a series....
of course I have to agree, but I'm not leaving the context - Joe Louis won the title once and I value him higher than Tyson. But you keep hearing...
Mike Weaver. but meeting Ken Norton probably did him some good
these are such funny comparisons. Ali had more problems with Doug Jones than Tyson had with James Tillis. They were both at about the same stage...
I still think it's a solid top 3. Why? because no one below has such achievements - defeating 5 current world champions, outclassing 3 Olympic...
Darius Michalczewsky - slow starter
the individual is always equal to the general population, never the other way around... Tyson in a better era would have had better rivals, better...
I'm not sure Holyfield. He had Tyson style, way. He wasn't a better fighter overall, but he could fight him. Holy in 1996 would probably be a...
in general, Bruno was a better fighter, but paradoxically, when he was the champion, he was already broken, burnt out, and his attitude in the...
Chares Martin... ok, Seldon and Bruno were weaker but that covers 30 years. Waluev, Ruiz and Byrd were also not real champions, it's hard for me...
don't know if I understood correctly, but could you explain to me what height and reach have to do with Holmes and Marciano?
Lewis did exactly the same but more times - after the fight with Holyfield, first he escaped from Ruiz, then Byrd, at the same time he was...
