I don't think Beterbiev is in his prime anymore so not sure beating Bivol is necessary or realistic at this stage.
You don't have to use circular reasoning to make the case for someone like Mayweather who conquered multiple divisions and never lost in his prime...
Cuevas was never lineal and wasn't facing the best. His best contemporaries at welterweight were Hearns, Leonard, Duran, Benitez, and Palomino...
I think this was in reference to him losing to Benitez. Duran lost to Kirkland Laing around the same time
Cuevas wouldn't rank above the best guys Mayweather beat in terms of accomplishments though probably not Benitez either. Duran became pretty...
Maybe so but one could reasonably argue that the best men Fury beat are at least comparable to the best guys Lewis beat with Wladimir being...
People talk about him being the best since Lewis but I think Lewis may be overrated H2H. Were the guys Lewis beat really any better than the best...
Do you think Mairis Briedis would beat everyone on Listons win resume and if not who wouldn't he beat? This is only guys he beat so not Ali
Usyk is largely untested at heavyweight. So it's not clear how big a deal beating him is.
Funny he couldn't beat Bowe then a guy who did little outside of beating Holyfield and was thrashed by Golota
Stiverne realistically ability wise wasn't top 5 maybe not top 10
Klitschko did a far better job of cleaning out his era than Fury has. Fury has missed out on Ortiz Vitali Klitschko Povetkin Chagaev Haye...
Furys opposition wasn't good going into the Klitschko fight so Klitschko had little reason to put him high on a list of guys to fight
I don't think so really. In his prior fight many had Holmes clearly losing to Carl Williams. If Holmes is losing to the likes of Carl Williams...
Most people had Spinks clearly losing the Holmes rematch
