:scaredas:
:patsch Do you see how it comes across when you try and suggest that Cal would have beaten Hops by a LARGER margin then he did when Hops was 43,...
While 47-4 is more than definitive; those 4 should still be shot.
And those words should be good enough. Well put. :good
Nonetheless, Hopkins is/was further removed from his prime then Calzaghe... It is a testament to him, that he has fought and won the fights he has...
Possibly, yes. Probably, no.
Nice, interesting match-up! Can't really argue with anything here.
100% Only a Calzaghe fan would say otherwise Roy Jones: "Calzaghe can't call himself the legend killer... all he did was confirm said legend's...
Wrong.
To anyone says that Mayweather has to fight anyone, like he owes anyone or thing something, are kidding themselves. The only people who really...
Sadly for you, most people who know what their talking about will rate Toney over Joe C... Actually, talking about people KNOWING what their...
Thank you... Joe is 44-1, possibly 43-2... Going by Calzaghe's fans criteria.
Unoffically (as in, in every sane person's minds) - I agree. He's the champ. Officially, he's NEVER been undisputed champ.
If the result was the proper one, as in, a UD for Whitaker with scores like 118-110, 118-111, 117-111 - would there have ever been the need?...
Officially it does. He never held the WBC, WBA and IBF belts together. THIS, hate to say it, is a requisite for an undisputed champion. How...
