Well I’m convinced, I stand corrected, that post has turned me full circle.
Truthfully not from your perspective. His last fight was at 175, he’s currently a 175 fighter. Or is he 154/155/164/160/168?
Only person who is that I can see is you. You defend him over anything and everything, it’s pretty scary considering you are meant to be an adult.
Don’t put yourself down kid.
Well his last fight was at 175 so.... Or do you still consider him a 154 fighter?
Out of the fighters you named both Golovkin and Canelo have only fought one and that’s Jacobs...
Last time I looked Canelo was at 175.
But mileage becomes mute when the body begins to age and the factors I stated take precedence. No fighter below heavyweight performs better after...
Yet you are the one quoting rounds and fights as a comparison and then calling me for stating the obvious. Mike Tyson is concrete evidence on how...
Prime for prime he has a chance against any on his day. However, I’d pick all four over him.
Ramirez last fight was at 175, Canelo could have made that in defence of his 175 title.
It’s cringeworthy that he passes as a grown up.
Great response, obviously proving I’m correct. You should try another forum kid.
Where’s the hate? Canelo v Charlo/GGG/Andrade/Saunders at 160 or Beterbiev/Gvozdyk/Bivol are far better fights than anything at 168. Or am I wrong?
That’s the true M.O of the daring to be great agenda group.
