Because he beat them both close to their best weights and closer to their primes. it's not as if he was 168 lber picking on a 147 lber which...
Please man, there's a matter of weight classes. Don't be stupid. P4P Tito and DLH would KTFO of Mikkel Kessler.
Kessler is not greater than Tarver, Wright, Trinidad, DLH. Kessler can't even be considered a great fighter yet.
Damn! Seems Mundine will be carrying the flag on his lonesome now.
Its a combination of the fact that Hopkins was weakened at that weight, which has been touched on in this thread already and had shown this in...
lol nope.
Yea...it shouldn't reflect poorly on Kessler. Bernard Hopkins is afterall a living legend :smoke
Mayweather/Hatton ?
The only legend I can think of that has a 0 on his loss column is Marciano, soon to be Calzaghe? :think
If I had to and the fight was at 147, I'd pick Cotto. Wouldn't feel real great about the situation, but yes, Cotto has a pretty decent shot at...
I made a similar bet on Spinks to beat Phillips not too long ago :patsch
Cotto has underrated speed as it is. He's pretty quick by any measures.
Stupid thread. You don't know Hopkins apparently, just look at his track record, he has credibility and is not going to blatantly foul himself out...
Great fighters had losses too. Glen Johnson was 32-0 when Hopkins took him apart.
Nice, Hopkins is an inspiration. And he may well surprise quite a few come April 19.
