I don't think you can say one is more convincing than the other. It's a style thing.
Yes, he makes good points. People want to see a young exciting HW rise through the ranks, Haye has an excellent platform but he still needs to...
Who cares, he had like 10 fights, while Ottke had 10 championships fights by then. Plus Ottke had those damn loaded gloves. A certified cheater is...
Chill...I was just making a point. Are you going to take apart my "can't attract flies" comment as well. Obviously he can attract some people even...
I disagree. A Spinks win was pretty much as close to a sure thing save the robbery. It's not people faults that they can't forsee a robbery.
Definitely what I was thinking. Spinks, great boxer but can't attract flies. Boxing is corrupt.
Another disgrace for boxing.
WTF is going on here?
ahhh cool, by the sounds of it Spinks could have gotten himself KO'd trying to please the viewers.
What was your prediction?
Cory :happy
Got a 100 on Spinks. Not paying much but I think it's pretty much a sure thing. So yea...don't let me down Cory lol.
Joe can be beat. **** precedents. You don't know Bernard Hopkins. Just look at his history. Joe has never faced a fighter on Hopkins level period.
It's all a bout styles...Kessler has never faced a dangerous puncher like Miranda. It's not a foregone conclusion...Although I do believe Kessler...
This doesn't bode well for Kessler, regardless of the fact I believe he would dismantle Miranda. You still have to prove your worth in the ring!
