You are the one who has not been objective and I exposed that. Now you get angry. But it is all good. This is head to head. So yes I do count...
what abou the Rahman draw. Draws do not count for you? Anyway, if you want to play that game. The only really decent fighter Old Foreman beat...
Well the first fight with Rahman was a draw and Toney made Rahman quit in the second fight.Again Toney was 20 pounds heavier in the first fight...
And the Toney that fought Holyfield was much better than the Toney that fought Peter. Yet you have no issue insisting on the Peter fight. It is...
Hagler by decision. Hopkins resume at middlweiht was not that impressive and he did lose later on the Jermain Taylor twice
The point was Toney was better than Stewart. You overplay the Peter card and have been called out on it by quite a few posters. It is really hard...
and Foreman went life and death with Alex Stewart.
Hearns by KO. It is a matter who will get their first.
Yes but this goes again to the Peter point which is just not a strong point.But I have no problem with anybody saying Foreman would beat Toney.
the scorecards were off. Toney outboxed him in the first one. Anyway, you do realize that he was 16 pounds heavier and 3 years older than against...
Moorer on points
Foreman (Holyfield version) by SD. Foreman did well against shorter more elusive fighters.
Actually Toney outpointed Peter in their first fight. And I guess for this thread we are talking best version of Toney at heavyweight (from...
you do not but you make assumptions
far busier, certainly not. busier, perhaps but do you have any punch stats for comparison?