froch vs basically everyone
i guess conn's best shot would be to ruffle gene pre fight and do everything to make it a war. are we using modern or period ref?
sandy saddler was best at 130 imo, but that wasn't an important division in his day. same for mclarnin at 140. maybe he never actually fought at...
speed diff too much, i pick jones, i'll say points but a ko wouldn't surprise me.
it's a lot closer than under modern rules. i gotta pick norton.
i did laugh, but, lets be real. it was funny.
have not read the thread or the definition of superheavyweight. lennox seems an obvious answer to me. that's the guy who was on top when hw size...
i pick george. he might have to get up a few times, how good he is at that stops me putting money on my pick. if foreman was also coked out his...
willard - nothing really, not gonna win gymnastics gold at the olympics but he was fine at what he did. he could add a bit of muscle and be top 10...
i think the edge goes to aj. he mostly looks for the shot frazier was vulnerable to.
fotc for me too.
sakuraba v gracie is prob the best example of why fights to the finish, whilst manly, kinda suck. gracie tried to win for a few rounds then tried...
froch. that groves punch would have had most down for a 30 count. it prob wasn't but that's the only time i remember him being hurt.
hagler by a point or two. can't really see a ko either way.
hearns benitez naz kelley duran srl 1 toney jirov froch groves 1 or a fun amir khan fight
