He's pretty smart using dirty tactics without them being noticed by the refs.
And Dariusz Michalczewski is still left out...
The Ring doesn't have a monopoly on crowning the lineal champs. Yes, he was rated number 3 by them, but other outlets didn't even have Sanders in...
It was a punch below belly button tho, so clear low blow. If facts don't change your opinion, then you're living in a bizzaro world. Which you do,...
Mike Tyson, even in his prime, was known to sometimes abandon his jab, which was a very good tool that helped him get inside of the opponent's...
Love how Fury is still afraid to fight him.
Who cares about the belts? He was still the lineal champion. And yes, he lost, but the consensus is, he got robbed.
Fury is more skilled, Wlad was better.
He was winning in the clinches. You can't do it without being stronger. But of course there are different types of strenght.
Well, I'm lacking brains then, cause Vitali literally retired because he couldn't stop getting injured.
Well, Luis Ortiz was winning the Wilder fights. So? Golota was winning the Bowe fights. So? You can be winning, but still lack something to close...
Frazier and Norton are way better scalps than Sanders and Peter. But yeah, Foreman doesn't have that much of Top 10 wins either.
George Foreman - almost 49, Shannon Briggs almost 26. 23 year difference.
Both of them had a good chance of beating this version Holmes. You can argue Carl Williams did it, but didn't get the decision and Pinklon and...
Big George proved he was a better fighter than Smokin' Joe twice. But did he also have a better resume?
