When grading resumes I look mostly at wins, and the mannor they won. Rather than oppoents fought. 1.Mayweather: Solid cross the board. 2....
Mayweather & Nonito (I think he can make lightweight)
A young De La Hoya might have earned a split decision loss to Mayweather. I think the biggest risk to Mayweather would be Trinidad
The myth of Montreal Duran the most inveicable boxer. He's the Sidd Finch of boxing
Any top ATG 25 welterweight smart enough not to go toe to toe with him. It's not like he domanated Leonard that fight. I'd go as far as to say...
Pretty much sums it up.
"B" He has a solid resume. He lacks the "Wow!" foe. Mostly due to the fact that there really hasn't been a "Wow!" Oppoent outside of Pacquiao...
Garcia can make Pacquiao back up. Pacquiao has probblems fighting backing up.
Most Cubans. They make two moves and stop, and repeat this over and over. Either two moves to the outside or two bounces and stop. Go you tube...
Gavilan would win a bout with Ortiz.
Yes, yes he is. He's done everything any all time great has done.
He's strong and a big dude, with decent boxing skills. I do think he needs more big fights though.
They get older. When your young it is easier to matain a low sometimes unnaturaly low weight. As you get older your matablalism slows down....
I think Taylor's wins over Hopkins. Even if they were close. Puts him ahead of Pavlik.
I think he also functions as a manager for his boxers. I think Emanuel Steward dose as well.
