You've obviously missed the sub-text. Had the author, i.e. me, written something more forceful, I would have had a legal problem.
So, so disappointed the Cook 'fight' wasn't mentioned...
True. Perhaps the author is trying to make a point without getting more legal correspondence?
Source?
Some of them will probably rip the article off now, like they regularly do.
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2011/exclusive-bookmakers-report-suspicious-burns-v-cook-bets-gambling-commission
Yes, and typically ****** took umbrage at Smith's question even being asked. Smith looked seething and rightly so.
:rofl:happy
It's not his call! It would die on its arse if it was, after the last one...
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2011/vitali-klitschko-willing-fight-david-haye Click through for a BBC interview filmed this morning... Hope it...
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2011/kenny-anderson-back-stoppage-win
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2011/dunstan-badly-knocked-out-afolabi-hamburg-undercard-report
Course it did. It's the July issue and it's no good having a fight on the front that's done three days into the month! No ****er would buy it...
Report on Big Richard here: http://news.boxrec.com/news/2011/brook-wins-lopsided-decision-over-tough-ndou
I received a message from K2 yesterday which said they hadn't decided on the weigh in yet... If it is behind closed doors, it'll be because...
