a-****ing-men.
i hate to bring another thread onto this one, BUT... you, of the omnipotent cerebral potential, still have not explained to me - but a humble...
the short answer is, THEY CAN'T DEFEND JMM'S RESUME. so they resort to their usual banter of "we're true boxing fans. *******s are just pac fans...
that's why i said "correct me if i'm wrong". since you're so educated about pac, why don't you educate me about who else has knocked him down....
as jeff m himself said, it's all subjective. but wait, it's the almighty nefarious from the jmm thread. **** fellas, here is the gospel and the...
as i said, and i acknowledge that i am inferior to your mighty intellect, no i don't get "the point" of listing jmm's 3 wins against **** fighters...
still waiting for your enlightening response great newbie. post reproduced for your consideration: ok, help me use my brain. tell me, wise...
as in more times than the ones i mentioned? can you be more specific? give a humble ******* some education so that i maybe released from this...
ok, help me use my brain. tell me, wise newbie, what was the whole point of listing jmm's 3 signature wins (with old man or shite next to the...
pac was ko'd in his 11th fight and in a title fight. plus he went down against nadel hussein. i think those are the only times he has touched the...
typical dumbass response. you know, instead of answering the question posed - in this case "name names" on jmm's resume - these dumbasses just...
ok, point taken on that one.
do i have to point out to you that you yourself listed pac's and jmm's opponents WHO HAVE SOME SEMBLANCE OF RECOGNITION? to explain a little bit...
the reverse applies as well. going by how a fighter looks is ****ing stupid. have a look at Manny Pacquiao the fighter. He's ****ing awkward and...
damn, you just proved that jmm's hype IS far greater than his actual resume.:lol::lol: pac is default p4p #1 due to his MANY fights with old...
