What is wrong with wanting GGG to fight a legit opponent before calling for a 3rd fight, officially he lost the rematch. I mean people are saying...
only 1 fighter in boxing history has ever held titles in 3-divisions at once and that was armstrong in the 30's almost 100 years ago if you don't...
Ok when comparing Oscar, Canelo,and Manny I can respect how you decide to look at fights, me personally factors i look at are, where was the...
We can debate rounds out I had Canelo winning 8-4 in the rematch and a draw in their first fight regardless of who I route for I take bias out of...
Yo I like the Kawhi Leonard quote Lakers taking it this year though King James revenge tour #4
Dude Kovalev is a Career LHW arguably beat whom some ppl considered P4P best in the 1st Ward fight only to be shafted, amazing all the talk was...
Fair enough I feel like in principle we agree that the regular title isn't the real champ, how little we value each is a different story again...
So your saying Fielding wasnt in the bottom half of the top 10 at the time of fight? I feel like your trying to grasp on to fielding to somehow...
Well he beat an Unbeaten GGG who was P4P rated in the rematch for the 160 Title, if he wins vs Kovalev that would be the #2 Rated LHW and the most...
Except that Canelo DID beat GGG in the rematch so your point is null.
I wouldn't go that far, there a big difference between a regional belt and a regular title. Now do I respect someone holding the regular WBA like...
I'm not sure if your trying to be rude or just a hater, as a Canelo fan and a Kovalev fan I think the Krusher should take it its weight classes...
I could see him defending at 168 at some point I think 175 is a stretch too far, good call on Armstrong I knew someone had to have done it before
It's hard to cheery pick a guy 2 divisions up, every one brings up kivalev being 4-3 but 2 of those losses were to Ward another perennial P4Per...
Personally I make a distinct different between a title holder and a champ, Canelo is Champ at 160 he's just a title holder at 68. Which is why in...
