This poll is going fine. Last time wlad barely get couple vote and now lot of votes. People are start to realize how boys are getting better all...
:rofl :rofl Wlad is better boxer in that family, altought Vitaly was very good that fight, like most of his fight's..
Was foreman hard diet or something ? He didint seem's like but his weighting only 220lbs..bigger is not always better, but good big fighter wins...
Chris Byrd is master boxer with huge hard (MCCline chin is not so good). Peter skills are very raw but his physicall strenght is very good....
Most of alis opponent's in 60th or 70th survive more rounds? Prime Tyson win only UD James Smith 6'5 and Tony Tucker 6'5 and they were tall guys....
Peter is 243 lbs and Foreman was in his prime 220lbs. I'm not so sure which one own's more pure strenght. Foreman is more skilled but peters hands...
Sure..
"Shavers, Liston, Foreman, Frazier, and Norton who all probably hit harder than Peter" They might hit as hard as Sanders, but they dont have same...
Anyone can go down and most fighters will do that sooner or later. Many of Ali's opponent were cruiserweights and much smaller than wlad's...
You mean Henry Cooper? Compare this opponent weight difference http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=180&cat=boxer...
Agree, but i dont believe Cooper can KO hard chinned much bigger heavyweights like Peter etc...
But Ali was down guy who was 188lbs and not even hard hitter.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnEDM4EC5kw
Shot is matter of opinion..so who was big and skilled opponent his prime which tyson beat?
Foremans opponent weights(a prime): 216 212 196 214 195 194 205 it's easy to be stronger man..........and they complain Byrd was to easy...
Who was biggest giant? and was he technically skilled fighter...Lewis was giant and also good boxer and he totally destroy Tyson..
