same goes for floyd 130 was his best domain garnered 8 title defenses and defeated 2 hofers in genaro hernandez and diego corrales. you do...
most definitely on many levels: duran was 15-7 in championship fights 46% success rate over a 30+ year career floyd 18-0 in championship...
they are losing their mother****ing minds thinking floyd would ever lose:deal 95% of victory is in training and nobody in boxing can outrain floyd...
are you aware that roberto duran never defended a title he won outside of 135. at 147, 154, and 160 duran never had a successful title...
it does mean something, **** 6 months earlier duran had defeated barkley how the **** does beating barkley mean something but losing to ray...
no you are deluding yourself. those fighters you listed aboe where not duran's best opposition. as a matter of fact you can't find one atg at 135...
what are you floyd's promoter ass wipe go **** yourself:deal:dead:admin:|
if ken buchanan is in the hof iran barkely will get in he at least won titles in 3 weight classes
Quote: boxrec is facts dip ****:admin I have more faith in boxrec's accuracy then your's a duran nuthugger...Boxrec has a team of analyst doing...
duran couldn't stop kirkland laing how is he going to stop the greates defensive fighter of our era:deal duran didn't do **** at 147 except get...
all of the fighters I mentioned not only never lost at 135 but dominated their era just like duran did. duran is an atg at 135 I am not taking...
I already said he was top ten at 135 go back and read my posts:deal if you said duran was top 5 at 135 I wouldn't argue but when people start...
most duran nut jobs don't:deal boxrec is facts dip ****:admin I feel a excuse making torrent coming..let me get ready for this ****: 1. duran...
I agree about Kelly being able to beat Duran:thumbsup duran is top 3 at 135 based on what..his 12 titile defenses against sub par...
you do realize how stupid you sound..ken buchanan only had 5 championship fights:deal dejesus was no better the fact that duran lost to him shows...
