Just because another boxer received favourable treatment, it doesn't make it right that Mayweather received favourable treatment.
(1) Deflection. (2) No. (3) Irrelevant argument.
Well seeing how the referees allowed Mayweather more time to clinch than other boxers, yes.
That is incorrect. Mayweather was tested on April the 21st. The IV was administered on May 1st. Mayweather could well have used PEDs between...
Then why did you say above that PED use the night before the fight would have no effect on a boxer's performance? As for him not failing a test:...
Okay, but can you accept that you were misinformed about the situation? You seem to think that people are arguing that the IV was a performance...
You have again missed the point. The IV was not a PED. Rather it had the potential to mask any use of illegal performance enhancers such as EPO...
This is what Roach actually said: "We appeased Mayweather by agreeing to a urine analysis at any time, and blood testing before the press...
Source? You are aware that there is more evidence that Mayweather used illegal PEDs than Pac, right?
I never said that Morales didn't slow down. However Pacquiao tightened up his game greatly. He had better footwork, better head movement, and a...
You claimed to have "schooled me" which if not an insult, is hostile. But if you wish to stick to boxing, then so be it. Pacquiao improved far...
When you pretended to be an expert on Pacquiao's career. You insulted the entire forum.
You insulted me first actually.
Imagine if that was a publicity stunt.
You are a little nerd. You couldn't school anyone.
