He was sensational. Probably underrated in terms of skill. His way of closing gthe distance while remaining elusive was impressive and...
I don't agree with what he says here, but why don't we just call everything you write biased then too? After all, someone here might see it that...
So you use your knowledge to form level-headed hypotheses and Ray Arcel uses his to form "obvious bias." Got it. Just waited to make sure I had...
What makes you think you know more than an old timer? What qualifies you?
Despite the fact I am a big Hagler fan and don't like Monzon, I voted Monzon by decision. Too good at nullifying.
He's new, and probably doesn't know what has and hasn't been done here how many times. Doesn't hurt anyone.
Here's what I wrote up about it in the "What Fights Did You Watch Today" thread....... Junior Jones W12 Orlando Canizales Couldn't remember if...
Yeah, but see that's the thing. It's easy to look in the rear-view and say after the fact that Fenech had already seen his best days, but no...
The hispter view of him here for a few years was that he was decent at a lot of things but a master of none, and was accordingly derided a bit...
1. Terrible finisher 2. Too frugal with punch output, limiting his chances of success. 3. Became a trialhorse the last several years of his...
Chavez Arguello Camacho Mancini Whitaker Rosario Ramirez Bramble Paul Haugen
Aw man........ R.I.P., Mr. Buchanan. Really old-school blend of boxing prowess and bulldog toughness.
I'd have probably Qawi, Starling, and maybe Camacho. Camacho was only as unhittable as he was because of speed and reflexes, but that counts too.
Elizondo-Kenty was one of the strangest fights I've seen. Kenty has a great first round, Elizondo a great second, and that was it. Fight over....
Volume One might be the most exhaustively researched sports book I've ever read. It's not the gushing love letter to Dempsey that Kahn's book is....
