nazim probably saw marquez land a few rights and wants mosley to try his luck with his vicious rights. also, floyd throws that jab to the body a...
i agreed with the first line of what you said. then i saw your example and dismissed you as a person who plays too much boxing video games.
you make a shitty list and call someone else's vote a joke? please. whitaker whips calzaghe's ass despite the weight difference and hagler does...
there's a difference between being educated and being intelligent. when it comes to fighting, ther mayweathers are very intelligent. becareful not...
:rofl:rofl:rofl good one!
at least he fought castillo a second time. how many fighters have we seen receive a gift or close decision and then take credit for the faulty...
the problem with Money is that, he has more to accomplish if he is to achieve a legacy that is as great as he proclaims. without a doubt...
i have to go with Hopkins. sure many hate his style, but in 50+ fights against solid (and some great) competition, when is the last time you saw...
i agree with you 100% you're a smart guy:good i also agree with those who said zab judah and jermain taylor. oscar's a tougher call to me.
the topic was STRAIGHT RIGHT HANDS. i haven't been a fan of boxing but for a few years, but i imagine the list would look like: Hearns Hopkins...
it was never survival first because he was never in danger. in round 7, his 3 punches at the end out did anything calzaghe did the whole fight....
that statement just cost you all of your credibility.
i know what you mean. but as you saw in his fight with hopkins, aside from the low blow, he never hurt hopkins. hopkins did the damage and won the...
for the most part yes. but even though his opponents were better than caalzaghe's. it's not just title defenses. hopkins fought better opposition...
and they expected hopkins to receive only 3 million dollars for the fight while calzaghe got 6 million.
