Don't compare Langford to Jimmy. Most of Langford loss record is due to throwing fights and having to carry fighters due to not wanting them to...
I agree that Jimmy was a brillant fighter, but i dont think he was top 20. And is no were near as good as the likes of Monzon or Whiatker.
I respect your opinion. But I feel Holmes had the more domiant title reign and was the more consistet fighter which makes him the better fighter.
I don't have Foreman extremely high. But I do rate him. Foreman's Resume Of Wins..... Joe Frazier (29-0) x2 Ken Norton Chuvalo Lyle Qawi...
Ross and Canzoneri also beat Jimmy do, which I feel takes some shine off them wins as they beat him to. And lets not forget, Jimmy lost to some...
He would win a big fight, lose win, and some of his biggest wins, he also lost to that fighter. Sorry I don't think he is a top 20, and thats my...
All great great fighters. But just a to high for my liking and especailly when they are higher than the likes of Whitaker, Monzon, Hagler,...
Green vs Jones could be Aussie's biggest ever fight, and I wonder how Mundine feels as he isnt invovled in it and the limelight isn't on him. And...
That's a hard pick. I edge towards Froch
McLarnin was a great fighter. But he was inconsistet and didnt have dominanat title reign. Lets not forget Ring Magazine didnt even have him in...
Jimmy was a great fighter, but he shound't be higher than the likes of Charles, Leonard, Moore, Whiatker, Monzon, Foreman, Hagler, and Holmes.
I agree............
I think Bert has Dempsey, McLarnin, Cerdan, Griffith, Napoles, Conn, Rosenbloom, Zarate, Beau Jack, Sonny Liston, Jersey Joe Walcott, Tony Zale,...
.Armstrong .Tiger .Lamotta .Jeffries .Marciano
Bellwer and Clevery needs to happen, that is the British LHW fight everyone wants to see.
