Patterson was green in 1956 what the hell are you talking about
Charles was clearly past his prime against Louis, he was in his prime at 175, stop talking nonsenses..you are comparing a guy who fought at lhw...
Patterson weighed 190 against johansson in his peak, and he was a top guy even in the late 60s and early 70s he did beat...
Lmao
I said that peak patterson weighed 190 pounds, peak Charles weighed 175. Like always you are a manipulator. Patterson was better because he was...
You are very boring repeating and i will not argue forever
A bit? 1974 Ali was much better than 77. 1977 Ali was a zombie
:lol: if you think so
I say yes, my man is George and he is stronger and probably harder puncher blow for blow(not by much) but the combination of speed,accuracy, power...
Patterson was much better at hw than Charles actually and h2h too, he was naturally bigger wider than Charles and Holyfield much bigger. Charles...
Holyfield was much bigger than Charles, he was a natural 200 pounder ,plus he was one of the top dogs in one of the strongest eras ever against...
What an absurd argument, i doubt that the defeat of spinks against Tyson looked equal than spoon "losing" against Holmes for example. You can lose...
Yeah but their full careers were in the "hw" division,it is not the case of Charles
I am being realistic my bro. But marciano and Dempsey were naturally bigger than Charles to be fair, look at and compare their frames regardless...
Spinks is not ranked at all at hw, he has very few fights, Charles was a lhw in his own era, the fact he was competitive against "the hws" of his...
