What about the "film disadvantage myth"? https://viewsync.net/watch?v=amFgqFUw4wM&t=311.52&v=cf67JevtNcc&t=229.45&mode=solo
I think Johnny can match this looking more solid. Of course Carnera has more size adv. than him, thats a true argument. [MEDIA]
Since we´ve seen Carnera fight, we can give Johnny the benefit of the doubt.
Have you watched them fight on parallel view against even very young and unpolished pros? Carnera had size, Baer could punch a little and block...
Thats right. But an amateur with no power, no chin (other the recuperation) and no balance or whatsover finished him with a 1 - 1. Apart from...
If he looks a solid 220lb, hence this thread is way less ridiculous. Did I mention that two amateurs, one Hollywood fighter with power + beard...
We can assume that Johnny has to worry more about power this time. Less time to adept against a featherfist boxer with the reach adv.
Put him against De Leon or Qawi. His power was nonexitent at 190lb HW, it would be void at 220.
As I read it, he stopped boxing events but fought on until now. And I´m talking about a guy, who looks and very well is worse than Donnie Long won...
Well, I´d say Donnie Long looks better than Carnera on film. And Carnera fought and won championships back then. With a 60-70lb weight adv. [MEDIA]
Wait.. wait wait! Thats random inductive logic you´re picking here! Why don´t we pick total random opponents that much HW today to proof we can...
We know these that were taken and know that even in the 40s and 50s lean good 220-pounders did rarely exist. I wrote tons of text to dumblab,...
Reflecting his career at modern 220lb is not possible, because its not existent. Its a guess how he would do here. A total oaf took him 21 and...
Of course his claims are more than brave. But 1) Carnera had nothing 2) Sharkey is miles away from something like a resume at 220lb+ 3) Sharkey...
He wrote he fought amateur comp. until then. Carnera took Sharkey 21 rounds. When Rocky can fight Foremans, a solid 220lb amateur with a training...
