A 20 years old foreman had more things in common with dempsey than a simpleton like you could imagine. 1 word. Savage. I remember a the ring...
Ike was much closer to holyfield or even norton than he was to frazier
Like i said you have no clue about boxing...not even close in their styles.
Get banned stupid troll
If you are insinuating that he would beat great big men based on this victory over a big bum.... Lol just lol
And do you believe in this measure? (Plus you said bigger not equal)
Frazier and ike were as similar like ali and valuev.. You don't have any clue, go to watch tennis
Y es. Ike ibeabuchi is a good pick. Still i go with foreman... A natural physical monster who did not train weights and still was a huge thick...
He loses against all them. Bowe should be careful because his poor defence but he was proved he had all time great blood. He would be the last man...
Agreed. He was weak like hell. Fragile body
all muscle? Hearns was all skin and bone
Exactly.he is just a stupid troll
Lamotta is one of my heros but the 60% of his physical was his huge head
Dempsey has faster hands,faster feet, much better move of head, better defence, faster starter,better combo puncher, he is bigger,hits as hard,he...
Williams was a mediocre fighter but yeah.he could bang. Foreman rated him over liston as puncher
