yeah, but in fairness to Camacho, he too was a veteran fighter at that point and past his best and fighting the bigger man as well. I say it shows...
I agree and disagree. Charles is one of my favorites, and he is among the Very Best, absolutely NO question, but all theses different titles...
^^^ this to both your threads, he was GREAT and one of my favs too!!!
exactly, yes this too, therefore making the film shite, but the fighters NOT!
great post, I'd just like to again remind people of the poor film footage reality! look at Black & White pictures in the paper or periodicals...
and along with Lloyd Marshall just about my most favoured of great fighters fit for anyone in their respected weight divisions!
it really is hard too believe the amount of foolishness goes into Hopkins love and other overated fighters like him. This is why I pay NO...
i feel this too about the movie, Rocky was a good believable story, the rest were exploiting the interest. Stallone "the actor" has nothing to do...
I haven't said anything on this thread as yet, but in short Bugner WAS a worthy Contender, a British HW great and deserves moocho respecto.
it is true of Klompton he can be an ignorant *****, and nobody knows but Klompton... but I agree his book should probably be quite informative....
I got him among them!
ONLY H2H, who's proven in Battle & Longeviety against fellow top men and especially heavier bigger men. NO Achievement points here. Many are...
bump.
what was the Big Fat promoter called, was it him?
he shat himself in the fight too, and it is quite visable. he did find confidence however, when he found he was able to stay him off and land....
