at his BEST, WHO is the BEST he could beat? he was a lovely boxer, not a slickster or sylist, but a lovel boxer all the same, and we all know he...
everybody sided with Norton and still do, God's Health & Blessings on you Kenny. and THANKS!
joe gans was among them, benny leonard, jack johnson, Langford, Tony C & the baby face assasin, there were a few who got the acolade. more too...
Arthur Donavan from the good old days 1930s & 40s must have refereed about a million fights, he's in darn near every picture of that era that you...
Good Boxer, Better Fighter, poor Era. Thats it!
yeah and he probably would.
No Walker walks it!
[IMG] thanks Burt... Mauriello though getting beat capitalises when given an opening!...
Woodcock was apparently leading that bout until he led with his chin and Tami wasted no time at seeing the opening. Woodcock got plenty of praise...
some nice bouts there Burt, Ringside seats at the Eternal Palladium, add Cerdan v Burley, you buy the Hotdogs I'll get the Beers:good.
too many to even think of... I'd say Ali v Louis and Tyson v Marciano for HWs... Zale v Hagler or Hagler v Benn I always thought Britain's...
THINK like back then, men fought at basically their natural weight give or take a few pounds... Duran's whole understanding and that of his...
in the 1940s Duran wouldn't have considered 135, maybe pass through it as a young novice fighter, Duran would be very much a proper WW... Hearns...
the fab 4 in the 1940s would be fighting at different weights & scheduals, WHO do they fight & how do they do? Hagler would be a MW cum L-HW....
I like Bute and thought he might have done it the first time round, however I also believe Froch is at his ultimate best and if he keeps up this...
