Wladimir has never lost to an opponent of Lewis, but Lewis has lost to an opponent of Wladimir.
He could continue taking belts at 61 and you would still hear people saying "there is nothing suspicious about this; he is simply great defensively".
I'm sure that is the case with many, many athletes, but extraordinarily few of them are participating at a world class level at 48.
A rematch is usually brought about if a fight was close. Wladimir winning by an average of 8 rounds is not a close fight. Ibragimov and Peter came...
Really? I think that's pretty ****ing naive.
Yes, Hopkin is a genius - da Vinci, Aristotle, Einstein, Hopkins. I believe Hopkins is juiced up. People say he can fight to 48 because he only...
This is the same guy who is terrified of Price.
I don't know at the moment. I think we will have to wait until Price faces someone in the top 20 again before we know where he stands, and I don't...
The fighters' chances of beating Povetkin (I added a few names): David Haye 60% Kubrat Pulev 50% Odlanier Solis 60% Tyson Fury 50% Malik Scott...
If Wlad's performance was ****, David Haye's must have been the worst of all time.
No one is worse than Harrison, except maybe, maybe, Tye Fields.
'Wladimir Klitschko is a paper champ' must be a contender for dumbest comment of the year.
Your just pissed of that he is going to beat up a fellow Italian.
Wlad vs Wlod?
How many turned up to watch Haye vs Harrison?
