no. US PPVs for these superfights cost US$ 50 while in the UK, this will cost about US$ 25. this means that mayweather earned more with the 850k...
no. ricky will get a bigger total revenue here since he will also get a part of the more expensive US PPVs and his guaranteed purse here will also...
good idea. :good
in UK, definitely. but in the US where the fight will be, no.
yep. hatton is not a PPV draw in the US. his last fight w/ malignaggi wasn't even PPV in the US while pac has PPV fights even w/ opponents like...
UK PPVs cost only half of US PPVs. that means hatton needs for UK PPV buys to be twice the number of US PPV buys to bring in equal revenue in...
it's not all about money for him. it's also about status. status of being the best fighter in all of boxing as well as its biggest star. he knows...
like somebody said here, how could you call pac greedy when he gives lots of his money to charity. i'm sure that him asking 60/40 was more of a...
ok. i'll hold you for this statement when the time comes.
yep. i'm sure we'll hear that hatton is waaay past prime or hatton is shot when pac KOs hatton just like after every pac fight. :-(
that was like about 10 years ago.... :nut how about hatton getting KTFO'd by a ring post as recent as 3 fights ago. :deal
actually, it's pac's left lead more than his right jab that will give hatton trouble. that's aside from his patented left straight and sharp right...
not the greatest but already one worthy of being an ATG of this sport.
yes, he is. a five-weight and 3-time lineal champ having fought from flyweight all up to welter has to be there.
i think mayweather did by virtue of his 70/30 guaranteed purse split and US PPVs costing 2x more than UK PPVs. hatton got all the UK PPV revenues...
