the fight was close (4-4) until jmm got the opening w/ diaz being cut leading to that KO. without such an opening, jmm again either wins or loses...
no. jmm's conservative counter-punching style lends itself to close fights even with inferior opposition. casa was at least very much faded (many...
i think the better term is "wear down" not demolish. demolish is to completely destroy. that's an 8-0 or 7-1, then KOing the opponent, not 4-4 and...
not exactly a demolition. it was 4-4 before the KO in the 9th. a demolition is 8-0 or 7-1 and then winning via KO.
in jmm's last two fights. he has lost as many rounds as he has won before his KOs of both casa and j. diaz. pac on the other hand has won all the...
i would. jmm is 0-1-1 vs. pac. how can he therefore be co-#1 with pac?
hmm... another close fight before the KO. why can't jmm seem to dominate supposedly inferior competition? maybe it's just his conservative...
we're talking about an older genearation lakers-celtics rivalry here.... when kobe and shaq were at the lakers, the celtics were just an also-ran...
hatton is a class above juan diaz. but i will still take jmm via a decision in this fight. being p4p #2, jmm is just at a higher class and...
well, he should being that barrera is very faded and jmm being the p4p #2. that's why i still can't figure out why jmm had such a diificult time...
lie. pac and roach already said very recently that if jmm is willing to go to 140, they will have no probs fighting him again.
it's all about class and talent here. pac and jmm being the top 2 p4p fighters in the world will both have their way against a B to B+ level...
if he can, definitely yes.
pac was a 2-3 to 1 underdog in the dlh fight. jmm was the favorite in the juan diaz fight. the bigger win was pac's . but it was a great...
this is not amateur boxing. if jmm wants to win vs. pac, he has to avoid being KD'd. close fights are decided by KDs. fights between pac and jmm...
