A good bare knuckle fighter is a tough guy who can brawl, can take a punch and land a hard punch. Nothing to do with modern boxing and gloves...
The problem is that this argument is based on your fantasy, this never happened, what we know is that even if the first fight was a draw canelo...
George Foreman destroys 71 Frazier any time And honestly 71 Ali was not even close to his prime version
A mini clip of a sparring session proves absolutely nothing. Ali could not outbox prime Frazier so Norton could make crap
Sorry but canelo proved on the ring that he was much better and more versatile than golovkin. Canelo did beat him, boxing and trading blows, both ways
Canelo? How? He did beat everybody except mayweather when he was a boy. And Floyd is one of the very best ever.
HE IS UNDERRATED BUT HE WOULD HAVE NOT BEATEN FURY, but Fury schooled wladimir so it is irrelevant, YES. FURY BEATS ANY VERSION OF WLADIMIR YES....
UNDERRATED. CLEARLY UNDERRATED
Hearns is too big for de la Hoya
Does anyone else think Berbick is very underrated? Usually the reason is because of his image losing against Tyson but he made a good fight...
Agreed 100%
I doubt it man. Patterson is very underrated, he would be a test even against Prime Marciano. Prime Louis stops Patterson but his 51 version was...
Too big? Bruno was as heavy if not heavier and he was pure muscle, bowe was flabby like hell. Bowe wins but not because he was too big .mate.
Can't be agree about Joshua mate. Walcott and Charles would school Dempsey but is possible that he could land the Ko shot late.
Yes but he would not be a dominant champion, Jack dempsey would be a monster in bareknuckle fights but under boxing rules is very overrated.
