This is revisionism and it shows you didn't either follow boxing back then or are simply biased. As seem to ignore 'what actually happened in Byrd...
Charles, boxing had moved to another level by this time and Charles became the king of the sport during this period. He does so many things better...
You haven't got it right. For one Winky wanted at least 50-50. Winky priced himself out of every big fight. I'm not sure whether Mayweather fights...
Whitaker is just a bit better all style issues aside for my money. But Whitaker beat Chavez and he wasn't just defence even if he didn't have...
Hopefully the Russians will settle for a gentlemanly dual between Vitali and Valuev
Most people on this board, if you believe them that is
You don't rank Tyson, Dempsey, Walcott, Charles, Jack Johnson in your top 10? And be fair he's also only 1 of 2 top 20 HWs to have never lost...
He's arguably no1 because he has possibly the best wins resume combined with beating every man he faced including the next Ring Champ at the age...
I could see Armstrong being stopped late here, it depends if Robinson was carrying him or not I suppose.
Less top trainers and more of an emphasis on strength and being strong/big at the weight.
Tunney would outbox him but his low hands against Louis's fast powerful hands may see him get put to sleep. Tunney UD or Louis late KO...
Not really a fair fight to Terry, McClellan was a 180lb bomber and would destroy the smaller man. Norris would batter Mayweather, Whitaker,...
Naseem Hamed probably
Calzaghe would be too fast for him I think.
Lamotta is the most overrated MW of all time. 1 controversial decision over Robinson when SRR weighed 144lbs, losing and going to numerous SDs...
