Haye would win, bigger, quicker, more power and doesn't give much away. Spinks is overrated because of going to the wire against a past it Holmes.
Pretty easily, not that that downgrades Wlad, Lewis was just that good.
Audley Harrison would beat Jeffries tbh
Which is why they kept saying they'd make it before making up excuses and then saying Wills would never get his title shot. All the papers mocked...
Tyson's too quick for Toney all else aside
He'd beat a good few of the worse champions, this is some highlights of the Berbick fight for those that haven't seen it. Against a lesser...
No dominance is the best thing he has going for him, he would have improved his legacy by fighting at the top level for longer than the 4 years...
Prime for prime, Rudduck has a puncher's chance increased by his speed and athleticism.
80s through into the 90s has more talent than anytime in history imo
I suggest this because 1000s of boxers could beat Dempsey because he was an average boxer, decent but not the best for his time but not a great...
There are simple answer Dempsey fans can't accept. Having said that what do you dispute?
Your intellectually dishonest hate of Wills to protect your hero is never ending McVey. Langford was prime or near prime when Wills started...
Tyson KO5, comeback Foreman was a gatekeeper who got lucky
Wills was a rank novice when he sparred Johnson even so he roughed Johnson up a bit. He went to Johnson Willard to challenge the winner. Jack...
On paper Dempsey's best win, stylistically an easy win though. Gibbons was an in fighter who was quite a 1 handed left hooker while being around...
