The fact remains that Bowes resume is extremely thin. I don't see how beating Golota more convincingly helps him much in that regard. Also not...
Holyfield was pretty clearly better than Ruddock, you disagree? If so, maybe a constructive argument to help your case
No, he has 3 prime losses-Douglas and Holyfield (2x) Tyson also missed out on numerous dangerous opponents Riddick Bowe Ray Mercer Tim...
Tyson lost to the best of his own era. That hurts any argument for top 10.
I should think Holyfield would keep Tyson out of the top 10
Holmes ranks above Tyson because he beat more ranked contenders and never lost in his prime. Holmes has no prime losses whereas Tyson has 3
Stewart's resume is obviously a problem if your trying to claim he is a huge puncher because he lacks stoppage wins that would be considered...
The version of Pinklon Thomas that Morrison fought was far past his prime, hadn't scored a noteworthy win in years and had been stopped in 3 of...
The narrative around the Bowe Holyfield trilogy seems like another example of really poor reasoning. Riddick Bowe got thrashed by Andrew Golota...
The issue with Foreman though is that a lot of his opponents seem to owe their reputations simply due to being fortuitous enough to fight in eras...
Corrie Sanders brutally stopped Wladimir Klitschko early. That's an impressive display of power against a guy whose other stoppage losses are due...
If they looked horrendous maybe its because Vitali had the skills to make them look bad. I don't see how Cooper, Briggs, Stewart, or Morrison can...
who wins?
Holmes was dropped by Snipes and Foreman was dropped by Young and Lyle. I don't see what makes Lyle or Snipes better punchers than guys Vitali...
Late 1990s Foreman couldn't even destroy Crawford Grimsley, but he destroys Liston, hmmmm
